Skip to main content

Swiss Krono Group adopts Unilin’s drop-down locking system Unidrop for Laminate and Hybrid-Resilient Flooring

09/09/2024
NEWS

Swiss Krono Group, one of the largest manufacturers of laminate flooring worldwide, is excited to introduce the Unidrop locking system for their laminate and hybrid resilient flooring. They will produce the drop locking system in manufacturing facilities around the globe to create more sustainable and consumer focused products.

Unilin resolves SPC trademark issue for its licensed partners

19/06/2024
NEWS

Unilin Technologies, the IP and technology division of Unilin, is pleased to announce that it has entered into an agreement with i4F relating to the use of US “SPC” trademark. This agreement resolves the issues surrounding “SPC” branded products in the US market, ensuring freedom to operate for Unilin’s licensees and their partners.

show result
Filter

Unilin wins important patent case against Windmöller

08/05/2019

• Validity of Unilin’s EP 2 588 311 confirmed in opposition proceedings before the EPO.

• The confirmed patent protects a broad range of clic LVT panels using fiberglass, irrespective of the type of locking mechanism used. 

• Decision can have important consequences for current and future patent cases.

On the 6th of May 2019, the European Patent Office (EPO) confirmed the validity of European patent No. 2 588 311 (“EP 311”) owned by Unilin BVBA (“Unilin”) in opposition proceedings filed by Windmöller GmbH (“Windmöller”). The patent covers the majority of clic LVT panels with a fiberglass layer being on the market nowadays, given the fact that the patent places no limitation on the particular type of locking system being used on the panel.

Windmöller filed the opposition against EP 311 before the EPO on February 2nd, 2018. After having heard all of Windmöller’s arguments, the EPO decided to maintain the patent in a form being novel and inventive over all of the cited prior art. The decision was pronounced at the oral hearing of May 6th, 2019 and is appealable.

Unilin had already filed an infringement action based on EP 311 against Windmöller before the court of Düsseldorf, Germany. 

The current EPO decision in favour of Unilin strengthens Unilin’s belief in a positive outcome of the above-mentioned infringement case in Düsseldorf and will also be a catalyst for further actions against unlicensed resilient products in order to protect the Unilin innovations and technologies.

In the news

Upcoming events

more events

Subscribe to our newsletter

Get regular updates on our innovations and ground-breaking technologies.

I agree with the privacy policy.